Direitos das Mulheres
June 17th, 2006 by 
Estela Guedes - Editor TriploG
Plataforma Portuguesa para os Direitos das Mulheres, Artigo publicado na revista 21RS de Juan de Dios Martin Velasco & Nove consultores para a Congregação vaticana para os religiosos
PROCONCIL
fundación para el diálogo y la conciliaridad social y religiosa
Estimado /a amigo/a:
Le invitamos a leer el artículo de Juan de Dios Martín Velasco*,
recientemente publicado en la revista 21RS.
*sacerdote diocesano, fué Rector del Seminario de Madrid; y Director,
hasta el año pasado, en que se jubiló, del Instituto Superior de Pastoral.
Una propuesta serena para afrontar la crisis de la Iglesia
02.06.06 @ 11:59:15. Archivado en 21RS-LA REVISTA , Juan de Dios Martin Velasco
Publicado en el número de junio de 21rs
La Fundación Santa María , siguiendo su meritoria labor, acaba de ofrecer los resultados del último estudio sobre la situación de la juventud española.
El informe Jóvenes españoles 2005 supone un paso más en el proceso dibujado por las sucesivas encuestas desde hace más de veinte años y ofrece un panorama sencillamente desolador sobre las opiniones, actitudes y posturas de la juventud española en relación con el cristianismo y, de forma muy especial, en relación con la Iglesia.
En los últimos diez años los jóvenes que se consideran católicos han pasado del 77% a menos del 50%; el número de los que creen en Dios ha descendido diez puntos desde 1999, mientras el de los que se declaran ateos, agnósticos e indiferentes se eleva al 46%; casi el 70% afirma no asistir nunca o casi nunca a misa y sólo el 5% lo hace semanalmente. Finalmente, la Iglesia ocupa el último lugar en el aprecio de los jóvenes, por detrás incluso de las empresas multinacionales.
Por las mismas fechas, la Conferencia Episcopal Española ha publicado su Instrucción Pastoral Teología y secularización. Los obispos no parecen tener una visión mucho más positiva de la situación, ya que su documento reconoce la “secularización interna de la Iglesia”, lamenta la existencia de una sociedad “tentada de apostatar silenciosamente de Dios” y constata que “en muchas familias se ha quebrado la transmisión de la fe”.
Pero cuando en esas circunstancias habría cabido esperar de los Pastores de la Iglesia una llamada a la reflexión sobre tales datos, a un profundo examen de conciencia y a la conversión de todos los que formamos parte de la Iglesia, la Declaración procede a una durísima invectiva contra “algunas propuestas teológicas deficientes”, a las que las notas a pie de página se encargan de poner nombres; contra determinadas formas de concebir y vivir la vida consagrada; y contra grupos eclesiales que estarían viviendo un “disenso silencioso” en relación con la Iglesia.
La lectura del documento ha producido verdadero dolor en muchos cristianos por la simplificación y, tal vez, tergiversación de las doctrinas y las posturas a las que se refiere, por el tono acre y desabrido del conjunto del texto y por la injusticia que supone atribuir a los teólogos, miembros de la vida consagrada y grupos incriminados intenciones y consecuencias tan graves como “transformar la misma constitución de la Iglesia para acomodarla a las opiniones del mundo”, dañar la unidad e integridad de la fe y la comunión de la Iglesia, “proyectar dudas y ambigüedades respecto a la vida cristiana”, haber influido en la crisis vocacional de los últimos años y hasta abrigar el deseo de provocar un “desierto vocacional”, y ser responsables de la quiebra de la transmisión de la fe.
Extraña además que los obispos hayan podido producir un texto de esa naturaleza sin sentir la necesidad de revisar sus formas de ejercicio del ministerio episcopal y sin practicar la más mínima autocrítica en relación con ellas.
Somos muchos los cristianos que, interpelados por la gravedad de la crisis del cristianismo en España y por la pérdida de credibilidad de la Iglesia, a la que todos contribuimos y que todos padecemos, deseamos ardientemente para todos sus miembros la recuperación de la alegría y la radicalidad del Evangelio.
Para ello creemos indispensable una reflexión valiente y lúcida sobre la situación y un diálogo sincero y respetuoso de todos: obispos y presbíteros, miembros de la vida consagrada, teólogos y fieles laicos y laicas que estamos y nos sentimos implicados en ella. Todo, naturalmente, en el único clima digno de una comunidad cristiana, el que crea la caridad fraterna, norma suprema de la vida y la acción de todos los discípulos de Jesucristo.
Juan de Dios Martin Velasco
RED PROCONCIL:
Por favor, contribuya a ampliar la red de comunicación de Proconcil; para
ello, difunda estas informaciones y anime a otras personas y
organizaciones a firmar la carta de petición al Papa titulada “Hacia un
Nuevo Concilio” a través de < www.proconcil.org/espanol/petic.htm >,
Gracias.
UNA PROPUESTA SERENA PARA AFRONTAR
LA CRISIS DE LA IGLESIA:
< http://blogs.periodistadigital.com/21rs.php/2006/06/02/p30320#more30320 >
Esperamos que sea de su interés.
Atentamente:
Emilia Robles y Javier Malagón
Fundación Proconcil
**************************
Uma mulher e oito Homens! Nem nisto as deixam entrar em pé de igualdade…( mensagem de quem me enviou)
Nove consultores para a Congregação vaticana para os religiosos
CIDADE DO VATICANO, segunda-feira, 12 de junho de 2006 (ZENIT.org ).- Bento XVI nomeou um bispo, sete sacerdotes e uma religiosa como consultores para a Congregação vaticana para os Institutos de Vida Consagrada e Sociedades de Vida Apostólica.
Segundo anunciou nesse sábado a Sala de Imprensa da Santa Sé, as pessoas eleitas apresentarão seu serviço de consulta particularmente na seção específica para os Institutos Religiosos desse dicastério vaticano.
Estes são os novos consultores:
–Dom Jean-Louis Bruguès, bispo de Angers (França).
–Dom Massimo Camisasca, superior geral da Fraternidade Sacerdotal dos Missionários de São Carlos Borromeu (Itália).
–Pe. Paolo Martinelli, O.F.M. Cap., presidente do Instituto Franciscano de Espiritualidade da Universidade Pontifícia «Antonianum», Roma.
–Padre Sante Bisignano, O.M.I., professor da Universidade Pontifícia Urbaniana de Roma.
–Padre Benoît-Dominique de La Soujeole, O.P., professor da Faculdade de Teologia da Universidade de Friburgo (Suíça).
–Padre Bernard Pitaud, P.S.S., superior provincial da França da Companhia dos Sacerdotes de São Sulpício.
–Padre Agostino Montan, C.S.I., professor da Universidade Pontifícia Lateranense de Roma.
–Padre Luigi Borriello, O.C.D., professor da Universidade Pontifícia Santo Tomás de Aquino («Angelicum») e da Faculdade Pontifícia Teológica e o Instituto Pontifício de Espiritualidade «Teresianum» de Roma.
–Irmã Jolanta Olech, U.S.J.K., superiora general das Ursulinas do Sagrado Coração de Jesus Agonizante e presidente da Conferência das Superioras Maiores da Polônia .
**************************
Na sequência do veto presidencial à chamada Lei da Paridade, seguidamente se transcreve a carta que, sobre esta matéria, foi enviada pelo Lobby Europeu de Mulheres (LEM) ao Presidente da República.
A Plataforma Portuguesa para os Direitos das Mulheres agradece antecipadamente a divulgação desta carta - cuja tradução em língua portuguesa segue abaixo da versão original - e solicita o seu apoio a este combate através, por exemplo, do envio de mensagens semelhantes aos(às) principais responsáveis políticos(as) cujos endereços de e-mail poderá encontrar no final desta mensagem.
Cartas de idêntico teor foram igualmente remetidas pelo LEM ao Presidente da Assembleia da República - Jaime Gama - aos Presidentes dos Grupos Parlamentares do PS - Alberto Martins - do PSD - Luís Marques Guedes - do PCP - Bernardino Soares - do CDS/PP - Nuno Teixeira de Melo - do BE - Luís Fazenda - à Presidente do Grupo Parlamentar do PEV - Heloísa Apolónia - à Presidente da Subcomissão Parlamentar para a Igualdade de Oportunidades - Maria do Rosário Carneiro - ao Primeiro-ministro - José Sócrates - ao Secretário de Estado da Presidência do Conselho de Ministros - Jorge Lacão - e à Presidente da Comissão para a Igualdade e para os Direitos das Mulheres - Elza Pais.
Presidente da República belem@presidencia.pt
Presidente da Assembleia da República - Jaime Gama gabpar@ar.parlamento.pt
Presidente do Grupo Parlamentar do PS - Alberto Martins albertomartins@ps.parlamento.pt; gp_ps@ps.parlamento.pt
Presidente do Grupo Parlamentar do PSD - Luís Marques Guedes lmmendes@psd.parlamento.pt; gp_psd@psd.parlamento.pt
Presidente do Grupo Parlamentar do PCP - Bernardino Soares bs@pcp.parlamento.pt; gp_pcp@pcp.parlamento.pt
Presidente do Grupo Parlamentar do CDS/PP - Nuno Teixeira de Melo nunomelo@pp.parlamento.pt; gp_pp@pp.parlamento.pt
Presidente do Grupo Parlamentar do BE - Luís Fazenda luis.fazenda@be.parlamento.pt; blocoar@ar.parlamento.pt
Presidente do Grupo Parlamentar do PEV - Heloísa Apolónia heloisa.apolonia@pev.parlamento.pt; PEV.correio@pev.parlamento.pt
Presidente da Subcomissão Parlamentar para a Igualdade de Oportunidades - Maria do Rosário Carneiro mrosario@ps.parlamento.pt
Primeiro-ministro - José Sócrates pm@pm.gov.pt
Secretário de Estado da Presidência do Conselho de Ministros - Jorge Lacão relacoes.publicas@pcm.gov.pt
Presidente da Comissão para a Igualdade e para os Direitos das Mulheres - Elza Pais cidm@mail.telepac.pt;
Saudações paritárias,
Ana Coucello
Presidente
LOBBY EUROPEEN DES FEMMES
EUROPEAN WOMEN’S LOBBY
Monsieur le Président de la République du Portugal
Aníbal Cavaco Silva
Chefe da Casa Civil
Dr. José Manuel Nunes Liberato
Palácio de Belém
Calçada da Ajuda, nº 11
1349-022 Lisboa
Portugal
Bruxelles, le 6 juin 2006
Monsieur le Président,
Concerne : Soutien du Lobby européen des femmes à la Loi sur la Parité au Portugal
Le Lobby européen des femmes (LEF) est la plus large coalition d’organisations non-gouvernementales de femmes au sein de l’Union européenne avec 4000 organisations membres travaillant ensemble pour la réalisation de l’égalité femmes-hommes en Europe. Le Lobby européen des femmes est représenté au Portugal par la Plate-forme Portugaise pour les Droits des Femmes.
Le LEF a pris connaissance du veto que vous avez posé à la promulgation de la Loi sur la Parité le 2 juin 2006 et du renvoi de la loi devant l’Assemblée de la République.
Le LEF est fermement engagé depuis des années dans le combat pour la parité aussi bien au niveau européen qu’au niveau national par le biais de ses organisations membres. De nombreux engagements officiels ont été pris par les États membres et les plus hautes instances de l’Union européenne envers la participation égale des femmes et des hommes à la prise de décision politique. L’article 4 de la Convention des Nations Unies pour l’Elimination de toutes les Formes de Discrimination envers les Femmes signée par le Portugal légalise l’adoption de « mesures temporaires spéciale visant à accélérer l’instauration d’une égalité de fait entre les hommes et les femmes » et de nombreux engagements politiques ont été pris au niveau de l’Union européenne et du Conseil de l’Europe.
L’adoption de la Loi sur la Parité au Portugal est une occasion unique de traduire ces engagements par des actions concrètes.
Cependant, nous voudrions souligner que l’exemple d’autres pays européens montre qu’une telle loi ne sera efficace pour contrer les obstacles structurels que les femmes rencontrent dans la vie politique que si elle s’accompagne de sanctions financières efficaces, notamment pour ce qui concerne son respect par les partis politiques.
La demande de parité au Portugal est déjà ancienne. Le projet de loi est fondé sur l’article 109 de la Constitution de la République portugaise - introduit en septembre 1997 - aux termes duquel : ” La participation directe et active des hommes et des femmes à la vie politique constitue la condition et l’instrument fondamental de la consolidation du système démocratique, la loi devant promouvoir l’égalité dans l’exercice des droits civiques et politiques et la non-discrimination pour l’accès aux fonctions politiques “.
Le Lobby européen des femmes s’associe donc à sa coordination portugaise pour vous demander instamment de faire tout ce qui est en votre pouvoir pour assurer qu’une Loi efficace sur la Parité sera rapidement adoptée au Portugal, ce qui constituerait une avancée pour la démocratie et une bonne pratique pour l’ensemble des Etats membres de l’Union européenne.
En espérant que vous serez en mesure de soutenir notre position, je vous prie d’agréer Monsieur, le Président, l’expression de ma haute considération,
Kirsti Kolthoff
Présidente du Lobby européen des femmes
TRADUÇÃO DA CARTA DO LOBBY EUROPEU DE MULHERES
Senhor Presidente,
Assunto: Apoio do Lobby Europeu de Mulheres à Lei da Paridade em Portugal
O Lobby Europeu de Mulheres (LEM) é a maior coligação de organizações não governamentais de mulheres no seio da União Europeia reunindo 4000 organizações que trabalham em conjunto para a realização da igualdade de mulheres e homens na Europa. O Lobby Europeu de Mulheres é representado em Portugal pela Plataforma Portuguesa para os Direitos das Mulheres.
O LEM tomou conhecimento do seu veto, de 2 de Junho de 2006, à promulgação da Lei da Paridade e da sua devolução à Assembleia da República.
Desde há muitos anos que o LEM está firmemente empenhado no combate pela paridade, tanto ao nível europeu, como ao nível nacional através das organizações suas filiadas. Numerosos compromissos oficiais têm sido assumidos pelos Estados-membros e pelas mais altas instâncias da União Europeia no que respeita à participação igual de mulheres e homens na tomada de decisão política. O artigo 4º da Convenção das Nações Unidas sobre a Eliminação de Todas as Formas de Discriminação contra as Mulheres, ratificada por Portugal, torna legal a adopção de “medidas temporárias especiais visando acelerar a instauração de uma igualdade de facto entre os homens e as mulheres” e numerosos compromissos políticos têm vindo a ser assumidos ao nível da União Europeia e do Conselho da Europa.
A aprovação em Portugal da Lei da Paridade é uma ocasião única para traduzir esses compromissos em acções concretas.
Queremos porém sublinhar, como o demonstra o exemplo de outros Países europeus, que uma lei desta natureza só é eficaz para ultrapassar os obstáculos estruturais que as mulheres enfrentam na vida política se ela for acompanhada de sanções financeiras vigorosas que nomeadamente garantam o seu cumprimento pelos partidos políticos.
A reivindicação da paridade em Portugal já é antiga. O projecto de lei fundamenta-se no artigo 109º da Constituição da República Portuguesa – introduzido em Setembro de 1997 - nos termos do qual “a participação directa e activa de homens e mulheres na vida política constitui condição e instrumento fundamental de consolidação do sistema democrático, devendo a lei promover a igualdade no exercício dos direitos cívicos e políticos e a não discriminação em função do sexo no acesso a cargos políticos”.
O Lobby Europeu de Mulheres associa-se, portanto, à sua coordenação portuguesa para firmemente lhe solicitar que faça tudo quanto esteja no seu poder para que uma Lei eficaz sobre a Paridade seja rapidamente adoptada em Portugal, o que constituiria um progresso para a Democracia e uma boa prática para o conjunto dos Estados-membros da União Europeia.
Esperando que possa apoiar a nossa posição, peço-lhe, Senhor Presidente, que aceite a expressão da minha elevada consideração.
a) Kirsti Kolthoff
Presidente do Lobby Europeu de Mulheres
Posted in TriploG | 
January 29th, 2010 at 9:21 pm
A cleaver men will do justice vs this androphobics even as terrorist bomb is better choice than being killing slowly by the feminism directly or indirectly
European Women’s Lobby
18 Rue Hydraulique B-1210 Bruxelles
Tel.: +32 (0)2 217 90 20
Fax: +32 (0)2 219 84 51
January 29th, 2010 at 9:48 pm
The hypocrisy and feminist manipulation in the society
(Some philosophical thesis)
Currently, we took knowledge of the feminist deputies in the European parliament that want to manipulate the merit and equality against men, especially whit the Sweden feminist presidency of Europe and many influences in the council of Europe .
is intellectual manipulation and violence form the feminist deputies that want to put women in power, just because they are women, even without having the status, merit, knowledge’s, social status, impartiality of gender ideologies specially feminist (that the majority of women in not), economic and scientific status and Further factors of psychological profile and intellectual and ethic profile .
If feminist in politics and society always assault men to coerce their rights and liberties, merits and power, and always try to put women superior to men, discriminating them positively without give and be humanist and give the same rights for equality and positive discrimination for men, specially in those issues that men is losing and affect.
Currently, men cannot live whit women, cannot establish relationships and it would increase the feminist hypocrisy whit the time, if is not blamed, arrested, accused those criminal feminist that manipulates traffic of influences, discrimination against men and positive discrimination to women.
They are going against the constitutionality, human right and humanism, and also against the nature and naturals laws of evolutionism.
Please block and lawsuit those feminist, coerce the political access, even if they are not radicals, androphobic’s, psychotics, obsessive lesbians that usually are radical feminists.
The feminism demands justice and equality but is just for women not for men, when men is victim or accused is not under the same treatment and law as a female, because feminism is hypocrisy and puts in reality equality as superiority and justice as exclusive for women but not for men, when for men they are less defended and victims as women.
The feminist crimes or considered but feminist stereotypes as mainstreaming against men, to make serious the crimes and discriminate them to benefit women but discriminate negatively men, exploiting men juridical and hypocritally and coercing men of the same rights to benefit. As you can see, many feminists crimes are consider and judge as a homicide or more than mutilation, that is unfair and instigating to make worst crimes as multiple homicides as terrorism and mutilations specially to coerce the expression and sensitivity organs.
Men is constantly discriminated in health, specially is it is illness that is by mainstreaming or exclusively against men, justice and family justice, politics, aesthetics and well-being, dressing and dress freedom, liberty of opinion against feminism and philosophical arguments, without mention that they are conformist to feminism and manipulated by them that they don’t even find the true arguments to defend themselves.
As for example many thing are devised and created by men, those thing have many commanding and as sex dignity should be men commanding otherwise if it is not men should have the same treatment to control the things that are controlled by women, women in nature had a traditional and biological sexually determinants to the pregnancy and child care, however men is stilling discriminated, nowadays to have the children when divorce or others rights as traditionally were for women, so for women have all the rights but not for men, meanwhile you should se that is difficult to have all the things, or is one things or another, but not for women and feminism.
Whit the intellectualization of women they become selfish, envies, to have the work, position and many men’s stuffs in society, specially the best ones, however the civil construction work they don’t want to do it and let that for men, reason that many men become sick, don’t develop their brain, become criminally, toxically dependents even by alcohol and tobacco, become stressed, psychotics and whit bad nutrition.
Whit the women feminist discrimination against men as by negligence and ignorance especially in health men become sick and whit the illness will behave criminally or whit indignity, even the justice if it is corrupted for feminism it would be better make justice by themselves and kill the female enemies that are screwing their lives. The ideology is the follow or is me or you, who die.
The men and women should live together as by nature but whit the artificialism even toxics that affects the sexual hormones , neurological systems as brains and many systems because to live better all the body systems should be better to live in harmony whit behave stability and whit that establish rational and balanced relationships whit women.
Many feminist men are incoherent whit themselves and their rights and they are making their death sentence even if they are ruining the rights of many men until arrive them but however they are protected by the feminist main female actors.
The feminism is manipulating and coercing the state of right, coercing fundamental rights from men, coercing the principle of contradictory, ideological-sexual impartially, sexual ethic whit other opposing sex, coercing the philosophical principles of dialogue and opposing philosophies against the feminism, coercing the liberty and right of conscience and opposition and resistance against the feminism.
Even in court and political parliament men is coerced and manipulated by feminist jurists that are hypocrite to the state of right of equal and unisexual and humanist justice.
It probably will arrive a time that men to have rights, freedom, warranties and privileges would have to change their sex, because feminism is pretty much worst in reality by medium and long time than machismo, that is naturalist, simples and privileges women in many stuff as privileges men in others.
Men subjected by the intellectual and psychological violence form feminism and women in the discrimination, female victimization and hypocrisy, female demagogy, united nations hypocrisy and feminism, political feminist organizations, feminist right organizations, non-governmental organizations that affect and manipulate women and men to become feminist and discriminate their selves as men as weaker , inferior, evils and illness, even many those effects are causing directly or directly by the feminist and their side effects.
The feminism is wining in the society because is very Intelligent, organized and whit many effort from many women that wants to manipulate the world and powerless men and coercing their rights and merit. Machismo never had been teacher in faculties and never had been intellectualized and justified their ideologies and easy natural ways to establish relationship whit the nature, men and women.
The nature is machismo and the world should follow as well, even if it is not 100% machismo and is balanced in some ways, becoming humanist too, however feminist wants to manipulate the nature whit the science as they make to treat some disadvantages of women, but they don’t allow for the disadvantages of men to make as well, in conclusion if the nature is manipulated so the men are, and should be even better men become homosexuals to don’t be exploited and abused by the feminist and by women, directly and directly, you can see a live between homosexuals are easier and less serious than between a heterosexual natural couple, nowadays…
Even the transsexuals, they are one direct or indirect cause of the feminism as underestimation of men, including masculinity and effect of hormonal disrupters (phthalates, biphenols and many unknown substances, yet, but however, fortunately it affects women as well even if not so much or not well known, when well studies their affect they feminist scientist and organizations would start to coerce those substances juridically by their influences in the 3 powers of the society and men will benefit from that, too), overflow of female hormones and toxic hormones and substances in men, pollution and illness against men.
You can see many men screwed in the feminist countries, many of them are dead, many of them are in arrested, many of them left the country, many of them are homosexuals, many of the become illness including psychiatric, many of them change the sex, many of them don’t make sex and don’t live whit a women because is difficult and mostly the consequences and fake accusations and money lost that they can suffer, so feminism is putting the relation whit women difficult and dangerous for men, even if they have to commit crimes in self defense or personal justice against bad women that become evils form love or another sentimental relationship.
They say in popular common sense, but that we can rectified to god sense, that a man when deals whit a bad women (usually used popular as bitch) or he died or he’s arrest. To complete in majority of the cases it is like that, when you don’t know the ideological, ethics, rationality, behavior and psychological stability and good influences from women that you deal or live.
So better alone and whit masturbation that whit women, you have probably much negative consequences whit them specially in feminist countries under the feminist law that it is manipulated by the international organizations from human rights, that are hypocrite whit men and discriminated negatively or by negligence men.
The friend can become enemy, love can become hate, as the positive extremely sense of live and nature, when don’t have a stable and balanced relationship and limited confront in bad times that could help to negotiate and establish the relationship.
For feminist and many women, man is not a human being and is worst than that, so they discriminate or they don’t treat well them as a women or themselves.
You can see the andropauses, the males illness (prostate cancer, epididime and testicle cancer, too) and homologate illness is not done, studies, treated in man, that is sadist and coerced to the mediatisation by the feminist journalist and politicians. That we can compare whit the menopause and development in the breast cancer and uterus.
The sensiblisation of international, national feminists days are psychological violence against men, manipulation of Society and intellectual violence, too, all because there are many feminist in the united nations feminist sections and international organizations, that are protected by men and those men are being used by feminism as always, including in the Muslims countries.
Even the weaker catholic church in being used by feminist against the humanist that Jesus Christ try to stimulate whit all human beings, using catholic organizations, universities and many catholic influences, even if it is used demagogic arguments, deductive, fallacious and sophist arguments to manipulate them, as the feminist are getting successful.
It probably that would have to arrive a time that we would have to give owner live to fight in courts or in war fields against feminist and many feminist women that want sadistlly destroy and controlled men but don’t want the reciprocity acts, as they make those violence against children, too, but are not charged criminally of that and they don’t tell the truth or justified but coerce justification for men when men acts in same way.
It seems that there is no men, yet, that have the sensitivity juridical philosophy to argue against the feminists thesis in media, politics and organizations, probably because they are afraid to become victims or revenge form women and feminists, that coerce his freedom and rights, even liberty or objection of conscience.
The feminist suffer progress because many women that had be mothers exploited and manipulate their males sons, that those sons were in power positions that let them vote and gains more powers (see in the US women’s votes history how started), so those mothers they used the female sexual determinism to exploit men that are there sons, even if those females know that they are destroying the rights from their males sons directly or indirectly and inequality.
Men are exploited sexually by his sexual determinism and affective determinism that could be reproductive or maternally. Many women that were domestics treating the children took vantage of that to manipulate them when adults to defend them are their lobbies, even if they say complaining demagogically that were discriminated because had children to take care and could not work, that’s hypocrisy and is selfish because we cannot have all, you have to chose and make your option one or another not both, but for women is all, actually, specially in feminists countries that is increasing up to 80% in this world specially in richest countries, that the males AND MANY MALES foreigners are exploited in civil construction died in civil construction and many dangerous works including army, as US, Canada, UK, France, Spain, Belgium, Germany, Norway, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland (rich country whit the gold from the Jews and fiscal paradises, etc), Italy, Ireland and many more.
If you have the power and conditions for that, join us creating international organizations of andro-humanist rights, write books in several languages that you can used this ideas written here, create the international association of jurist men males rights, integrate the international organizations as the united nations council of human rights to confront the feminist organizations and defend men’s rights, create a male international associations network and males solidarity, create a country only for men, whit university, schools, laboratories, courts and men rights organizations, make lawsuits against unfair law in the national (supreme court and constitutional court), European (human rights European court and or European communities courts) and international courts (many that belongs to the hypocrite United Nations that is controlled by the Anglo-Saxony countries) if this last ones have jurisdiction, to be invalid the application of the law or rectified.
Best regards.
Thank you.
VIAMREC
VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MEN’S RIGHTS AND EQUALITY CONDITION